Which of the following is NOT an element required for a charge of child abduction?

In the context of child abduction, the elements typically involve actions that unlawfully remove or detain a child without the proper consent from a person who has legal custody or guardianship responsibilities over that child.

Legal justification for the abduction is not required as an element of the offense because, by definition, child abduction occurs when a child is taken or retained without valid legal authority or consent. The absence of such justification establishes that the act is wrongful and constitutes the crux of the charge.

The other elements mentioned, such as inducing a minor to leave, failing to comply with legal custody agreements, and the child's relationship to the defendant, are directly relevant to determining whether an abduction has occurred. Inducing a child to leave could imply coercion or manipulation, and failing to comply with legal custody agreements indicates a violation of existing legal obligations. The child's relationship to the defendant helps establish the context of the act, indicating whether the defendant had any custodial rights or responsibilities regarding the child. This all highlights why legal justification is not an element of child abduction; rather, it serves to underline the illegality of the act without any acceptable reasoning or authority.