What does the crime of "going armed to the terror of the people" typically involve?

The crime of "going armed to the terror of the people" primarily involves arming oneself with a weapon with the intent to intimidate or instill fear within a community or group of people. This concept is rooted in the idea that the mere presence of a weapon, particularly when it is displayed or carried in a manner that suggests aggression or intimidation, can create a sense of terror or apprehension among the public. The focus here is not on the legality of carrying the weapon, but rather on the intent and the resulting impact on those who witness it.

In this context, the other options diverge from the key elements of intimidation and intent. Carrying a firearm legally does not imply any intention to cause fear, making it a non-relevant factor in this specific crime. Similarly, carrying a weapon without intent to harm does not fit the definition, as the crime explicitly involves the element of intimidation. While engaging in target practice is a legitimate use of firearms that includes no intent to threaten or instill fear, it is unrelated to the concept of going armed to the terror of the people. Thus, the correct choice accurately encapsulates the core elements that characterize this crime.